Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lourdes Castro MS RD's avatar

Great question - when a grain is freshly milled into flour, it needs to rest for a few months to improve its baking function (it also softens the color). Bleaching speeds up the process. So no, unbleached flour will not change the baking process in a standard recipe. In fact, I feel unbleached flour performs better. King Arthur unbleached flour is my preferred/go-to brand. And when I've substituted with a bleached variety, my baked good doesn't perform as well. As mentioned, the unbleached variety is a bit more expensive (you'll pay about $2 to $3 more for a 5-pound bag), but in my view it is worth it. I hope this helps!

Expand full comment
Aaron Marcu's avatar

Thanks, Lourdes. Very informative. Just looked at the label for Gold Medal flour: "enriched, bleached, presifted." As if those words are all signs of beneficence by the manufacturer. Enriched and presifted seem fine. But bleached is stuck in the middle of that series of qualities. Similarly, Pillsbury Best reads: "Bleached, Enriched." I've used bleached flour for baking many times and always wondered what the heck "bleached" meant. It's much worse than I dreamed! If -- rather WHEN -- I change to using unbleached flour, does that change the baking process in standard recipes?

Expand full comment

No posts